The coverage gap.
Competitive matrix
| Provider |
Weekend coverage |
Methodology |
Confidence interval |
Open source |
| Chainlink Data Streams |
~ field-dependent |
Frozen LTP or opaque tokenized mark |
— none verifiable |
— closed |
| Pyth + Blue Ocean |
— overnight only |
Weighted median |
10.2% at claimed 95% |
~ partial |
| RedStone Live |
~ 24/7 marketed ** |
— undisclosed |
— none on public feed ** |
— closed |
| Soothsayer |
✓ weekend + CI |
✓ published math |
✓ aggregate-feed receipts |
✓ Apache-2.0 |
* Pyth's documentation recommends per-publisher self-attestation to ~95% coverage, but the aggregate served feed downstream protocols actually read does not publish a verifiable calibration receipt. Soothsayer publishes receipts at the aggregate-feed level — replayable against the persisted surface and 12 years of public data.
** Measured against RedStone's public REST gateway (api.redstone.finance/prices, 2026-04-26): point-only schema with no confidence field, 30-day retention cap, partial equity coverage (SPY, QQQ, MSTR available; TSLA, NVDA, HOOD, GOOGL empty; underliers only — no SPL xStock tokens). RedStone's paid Live tier may serve a different stream; not verifiable from public artifacts.
Wins 4 of 4 axes
Coverage is the race everyone’s running. Calibration transparency is the one nobody’s entered.
Soothsayer.
05 / 12